The title is a direct quote from Federal Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq today explaining why her government would not get invovled and outlaw generic drug companies from producing OxyContin. Some of the provinces have asked the federal government to ban the production of this drug because its cheaper version could make it easier for addicts to buy.
I find it difficult to understand how a government could use this logic to not ban a drug while at the same time increasing fines for people that use marijuana. From the same article:
“We need to make the decisions on prescription drugs based on science,” she told the media. “Scientists are there to provide that advice to us and we need to work with the system that we have in place.”
Except that there is mountains of evidence from science suggesting that marijuana is not nearly as harmful as other readily available drugs (alcohol for one) and can actually help the suffering of the sick. In fact there is now a “scientific article” that has determined that legalizing the substance actually brings about a decrease in driving accidents, mostly from the resulting decrease in the cases of drunk driving.
While I applaud the government’s decision today I wish that it would stop its hypocracy and look to change irrational and unscientific laws against illegal drugs.
Prime Minister Harper is up in the North for his yearly visit and has been promoting the land for future resource extraction especially based on the new law his government passed that necessitates only one environmental study before any new projects. He has been detailing how new resource projects are the key to ending native unemployment in the north and bringing jobs and prosperity to the region.
It got me thinking- is resource extraction something that brings jobs to locals? While the romantic images are of thousands of men staking claims along rivers and panning for gold, or going in and out of mines with pickaxes, I’d wager that in Canada the vast majority of this work is now done by highly skilled engineers with expensive equipment. In many ways that’s great, it means that mining is much more productive and that we can create much more wealth from far fewer working hours leaving more for everyone to enjoy. This is how we moved from a society that spent all of its time farming simply to subsist to being able to diversify and enjoy the wealth that is all around.
The issue is that I doubt that many of these new jobs are actually ones that will directly bring unemployment down. There are just not enough people in the regions to produce the skilled workers need and so instead there will be a large influx of people from the outside. That’s not such a bad thing, these newcomers will need to have housing, food, supplies, and everything else that they can buy with their wages so for those not so inclined to working in the sector there will be other jobs. What I’m interesting in knowing is how much of this extra are the different communities able to capture or if the windfall comes more from the royalties paid with everything brought from the ground.